The ever changing face of my PC screen...

You know, sooner or later, we won't have TVs. We won't have videos or DVDs. We won't even have a record/CD player in our homes. Why? Because our PCs are fast becoming the centre of our entertainment world. I'm not going to start talking about media centres here, as that's something for another day...

However, what has interested me this year, is the amount of live/streaming video which is being put online. The BBC and ITV are both showing Euro 2008 matches LIVE via their websites. Even just four years ago for the European Championships to be streamed live would have been unthinkable and/or technically not possible. But the BBC and ITV have realised that a) This is increasingly where their customers are heading and b) That there is a very real demand for this type of service.

I can speak from my own experience in both of these cases, as I can often watch sport online while my girlfriend decides to choose something less interesting :) It's not just the beautiful game which you can watch online. The BBC iPlayer has dozens of shows online, as does 4OD, along with many, many other video sharing websites. For those a bit more technical, you can even watch TV programs from around the world using many of the live streaming software programs which are freely available.

I'm interested to see the big players' moves in this arena. For many 'techy' types (like myself I guess) the thought of using your PC/laptop as your TV is not anything new. A small minority of people have been doing this for quite some time. But in the years to come, I think we'll start to see all traditional programming provided over the Internet, probably available for free and probably available at any time you want. This will most likely be funded by advertising, and if you look at some of the shows online already, you will start to see adverts appear prior to your program loading (many believe this is how YouTube could be monetised in the coming years)

It will be interesting to see how much more time we find ourselves set in front of our PC screens in the future. We could end up in world where it really is the only thing that we need, not only for work, but also for entertainment. This culture shift will also have a massive knock on effect for the advertising industry, with advertisers being able to communicate their messages to a much more refined audience and hopefully achieving a much better ROI.

Where will SEO be in five years?

One of the best questions to come from my talk in Southampton today was related to the future of SEO. Following on from my point that most people click on the left hand side of the search engine results pages (SERPs) or 'natural listings' or 'free listings', as opposed to the Pay Per Click listings. The gentleman in the audience wondered where SEO will be in five years time? If everyone cottons on the facts that SEO is a good thing and results in great things for their business (more sales, more brand awareness, beating the competition etc) then how will businesses be able to optimise their website and get it to the top of the search results?

This is something that I've seen a lot of in the last few months and was going to write about anyway. Already the competitive phrases all pull up very similar looking results, as most companies start to target the same phrases and use the same techniques (e.g. improving title tags, writing great META descriptions).

An example is shown below for 'chocolate fountains'


As you can see here, nearly every website has the phrase 'chocolate fountains' mentioned twice. This results in the pages looking very similar as the key phrases is highlighted in bold. As all of the websites are highlighted, there is little differentiation between the listings. As a result the user is going to find it difficult to make a decision between clicking on the first listing or the fifth.

It is a not very well known fact that 42% of searchers hit the first result regardless of what is returned. However, if all of the results look the same, will this still be the case? Will people trust Google to still give them the best result, or will they see a page of bold text and results all looking the same and not bother?

I would assume that Google are watching this activity very carefully to analyse the effect of optimisation on rankings, perhaps even to the point where they don't use the bold matching on some occasions.

Maybe in five years time, we might not be even worried about Google rankings and all searches maybe carried out in some other way or with some other company (Facebook? MySpace? Someone else?).

In the mean time though, companies serious about the Internet and getting the best results should look to maximise their returns through effective search engine optimisation. We're happy to talk to any company who wants to do this :)

If you have any views about where SEO is heading or where you think it will be in five years, please share your views with us below.

Conversational media Vs Traditional media - Will the winner please listen up?

One of the big areas of speculation from the mainstream 'people in the know' is where advertising and marketing is heading online. It appears the big media players are all fighting it out to create massive ad networks, buy buying numerous media properties/networks, to supply the media agencies and please the publishers at the same time.

In a very good article by John Battelle today discussing the growth & creation of ad networks, he mentions the power of 'conversational marketing' and how big companies have yet to figure out how to make the most of it and make it scalable, especially in relation to building brands online.

I was watching TV tonight and saw an advert for Shredded Wheat cereal;



and realised that some times getting the right message across is very difficult.

In this Shredded Wheat example, all I can see when I watch the advert is the ad agency sat in the big office coming up with ideas on whiteboards, not the people talking. I know it's not real and I'm not engaged with it. I can see why the idea of various people talking about how great the various features of the product could be good. Yes, it will work for a lot of people. Unfortunately I've become so involved/cynical about the whole 'mass media' advertising process that all I see are story boards and people sat in big offices coming up with lines to use on the advert.

The use of aged people = targeting the different demographics, very clever. The fact there are no artificial flavourings or colours = appeal to the health conscious consumer etc etc.

Big ad agencies are very used to creating adverts in this way, as pointed out by Mr Battelle. However can the message be conveyed in a better through conversational media and channels? The use of this new medium, conversational marketing, where communication is to two way, rather than one, is a big change and one which will appeal to different audiences. But with more and more ad spend going online and more and more time being spent online (up to six hours a week), how long is going to be before companies and agencies 'get' that broadcasting your messages isn't the best way to communicate?

Listening is becoming more important than ever, especially online, and companies who 'get' that, will succeed online.